Malta vs Netherlands: Gross fixed capital formation … Private square kilometre Purchasing

Malta
0.0112 units per square kilometre
in 2017
Netherlands
0.0051 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Malta rank
5th
Netherlands rank
8th

Gross fixed capital formation … Private square kilometre Purchasing over time

  • Malta
  • Netherlands
00.0030.0050.0070.010.013196119902019

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0.0112 units per square kilometre against 0.0051 units per square kilometre in Netherlands, a difference of 0.0061 units per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 2.2 times Netherlands's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Netherlands ahead.

Malta ranks 5th and Netherlands ranks 8th of 170 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 4 and Netherlands in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Netherlands Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0007 units per square kilometre 0.0013 units per square kilometre 0.0006 units per square kilometre Netherlands
1970s 0.0012 units per square kilometre 0.0019 units per square kilometre 0.0007 units per square kilometre Netherlands
1980s 0.0024 units per square kilometre 0.0021 units per square kilometre 0.0003 units per square kilometre Malta
1990s 0.0045 units per square kilometre 0.003 units per square kilometre 0.0015 units per square kilometre Malta
2000s 0.0064 units per square kilometre 0.004 units per square kilometre 0.0024 units per square kilometre Malta
2010s 0.0088 units per square kilometre 0.0041 units per square kilometre 0.0047 units per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices, Malta or Netherlands?
Malta, at 0.0112 units per square kilometre against 0.0051 units per square kilometre in Netherlands as of 2017.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices between Malta and Netherlands?
0.0061 units per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Netherlands?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Malta and Netherlands rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices?
Malta ranks 5th and Netherlands ranks 8th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Netherlands: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-private-sector-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-ppp-4/malta/netherlands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-private-sector-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-ppp-4/malta/netherlands/">Malta vs Netherlands: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,126 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017 divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.