Malaysia vs Vietnam: Gross fixed capital formation … Private square kilometre Purchasing

Malaysia
0.0004 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Vietnam
0.0004 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Malaysia rank
50th
Vietnam rank
53rd

Gross fixed capital formation … Private square kilometre Purchasing over time

  • Malaysia
  • Vietnam
00000196119902019

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 0.0004 units per square kilometre against 0.0004 units per square kilometre in Vietnam, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.1 times Vietnam's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malaysia ahead.

Malaysia ranks 50th and Vietnam ranks 53rd of 170 countries.

Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malaysia Vietnam Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Malaysia
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Malaysia
1980s 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Malaysia
1990s 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre Malaysia
2000s 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Malaysia
2010s 0.0003 units per square kilometre 0.0003 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices, Malaysia or Vietnam?
Malaysia, at 0.0004 units per square kilometre against 0.0004 units per square kilometre in Vietnam as of 2019.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices between Malaysia and Vietnam?
0 units per square kilometre, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Vietnam?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Malaysia and Vietnam rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices?
Malaysia ranks 50th and Vietnam ranks 53rd of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malaysia vs Vietnam: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-private-sector-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-ppp-4/malaysia/viet-nam/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-private-sector-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-ppp-4/malaysia/viet-nam/">Malaysia vs Vietnam: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,126 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017 divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.