Lithuania vs Sweden: Gross fixed capital formation … Private square kilometre Purchasing

Lithuania
0.0003 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Sweden
0.0003 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Lithuania rank
58th
Sweden rank
59th

Gross fixed capital formation … Private square kilometre Purchasing over time

  • Lithuania
  • Sweden
000000196119902019

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 0.0003 units per square kilometre against 0.0003 units per square kilometre in Sweden, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.2 times Sweden's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Sweden ahead.

Lithuania ranks 58th and Sweden ranks 59th of 170 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Sweden Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Sweden
2010s 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices, Lithuania or Sweden?
Lithuania, at 0.0003 units per square kilometre against 0.0003 units per square kilometre in Sweden as of 2019.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices between Lithuania and Sweden?
0 units per square kilometre, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Sweden?
28 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2019.
How do Lithuania and Sweden rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices?
Lithuania ranks 58th and Sweden ranks 59th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Sweden: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-private-sector-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-ppp-4/lithuania/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-private-sector-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-ppp-4/lithuania/sweden/">Lithuania vs Sweden: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,126 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017 divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.