Indonesia vs Malaysia: Gross fixed capital formation … Private square kilometre Purchasing

Indonesia
0.0005 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Malaysia
0.0004 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Indonesia rank
48th
Malaysia rank
50th

Gross fixed capital formation … Private square kilometre Purchasing over time

  • Indonesia
  • Malaysia
000000.001196119902019

How they compare

Indonesia currently reports 0.0005 units per square kilometre against 0.0004 units per square kilometre in Malaysia, a difference of 0.0001 units per square kilometre.

That makes Indonesia's figure about 1.1 times Malaysia's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Indonesia ahead.

Indonesia ranks 48th and Malaysia ranks 50th of 170 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 5 and Malaysia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia Malaysia Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Indonesia
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Indonesia
1980s 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Indonesia
1990s 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Malaysia
2000s 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Indonesia
2010s 0.0004 units per square kilometre 0.0003 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices, Indonesia or Malaysia?
Indonesia, at 0.0005 units per square kilometre against 0.0004 units per square kilometre in Malaysia as of 2019.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices between Indonesia and Malaysia?
0.0001 units per square kilometre, with Indonesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Malaysia?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Indonesia and Malaysia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices?
Indonesia ranks 48th and Malaysia ranks 50th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Indonesia vs Malaysia: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-private-sector-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-ppp-4/indonesia/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-private-sector-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-ppp-4/indonesia/malaysia/">Indonesia vs Malaysia: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,126 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017 divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.