India vs Portugal: Gross fixed capital formation … Private square kilometre Purchasing

India
0.0006 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Portugal
0.0006 units per square kilometre
in 2019
India rank
45th
Portugal rank
42nd

Gross fixed capital formation … Private square kilometre Purchasing over time

  • India
  • Portugal
0000.0010.001196119902019

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 0.0006 units per square kilometre against 0.0006 units per square kilometre in India, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

That makes Portugal's figure about 1.1 times India's.

Across all 59 years both countries report, Portugal has been ahead every year.

India ranks 45th and Portugal ranks 42nd of 170 countries.

Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade India Portugal Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0.0002 units per square kilometre Portugal
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0.0003 units per square kilometre 0.0002 units per square kilometre Portugal
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0.0003 units per square kilometre 0.0003 units per square kilometre Portugal
1990s 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0005 units per square kilometre 0.0004 units per square kilometre Portugal
2000s 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0.0007 units per square kilometre 0.0005 units per square kilometre Portugal
2010s 0.0005 units per square kilometre 0.0005 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre Portugal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices, India or Portugal?
Portugal, at 0.0006 units per square kilometre against 0.0006 units per square kilometre in India as of 2019.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices between India and Portugal?
0 units per square kilometre, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for India and Portugal?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do India and Portugal rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices?
India ranks 45th and Portugal ranks 42nd of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

India vs Portugal: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-private-sector-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-ppp-4/india/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-private-sector-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-ppp-4/india/portugal/">India vs Portugal: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,126 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017 divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.