Guatemala vs Latvia: Gross fixed capital formation … Private square kilometre Purchasing

Guatemala
0.0002 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Latvia
0.0002 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Guatemala rank
71st
Latvia rank
72nd

Gross fixed capital formation … Private square kilometre Purchasing over time

  • Guatemala
  • Latvia
00000196119902019

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 0.0002 units per square kilometre against 0.0002 units per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 71st and Latvia ranks 72nd of 170 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices, Guatemala or Latvia?
Guatemala, at 0.0002 units per square kilometre against 0.0002 units per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2019.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices between Guatemala and Latvia?
0 units per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Latvia?
28 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2019.
How do Guatemala and Latvia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices?
Guatemala ranks 71st and Latvia ranks 72nd of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Latvia: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-private-sector-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-ppp-4/guatemala/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-private-sector-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-ppp-4/guatemala/latvia/">Guatemala vs Latvia: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,126 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017 divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.