Cote d'Ivoire vs Uruguay: Gross fixed capital formation … Private square kilometre Purchasing

Cote d'Ivoire
0.0001 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Uruguay
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Cote d'Ivoire rank
109th
Uruguay rank
111th

Gross fixed capital formation … Private square kilometre Purchasing over time

  • Cote d'Ivoire
  • Uruguay
0000196119902019

How they compare

Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 0.0001 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Uruguay, a difference of 0.0001 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uruguay ahead.

Cote d'Ivoire ranks 109th and Uruguay ranks 111th of 170 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Cote d'Ivoire averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cote d'Ivoire Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Uruguay
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Uruguay
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Uruguay
2000s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Uruguay
2010s 0 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices, Cote d'Ivoire or Uruguay?
Cote d'Ivoire, at 0.0001 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Uruguay as of 2019.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices between Cote d'Ivoire and Uruguay?
0.0001 units per square kilometre, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Uruguay?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Cote d'Ivoire and Uruguay rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices?
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 109th and Uruguay ranks 111th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cote d'Ivoire vs Uruguay: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-private-sector-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-ppp-4/cote-d-ivoire/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-private-sector-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-ppp-4/cote-d-ivoire/uruguay/">Cote d'Ivoire vs Uruguay: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,126 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017 divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.