Congo vs Suriname: Gross fixed capital formation … Private square kilometre Purchasing

Congo
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Suriname
0 units per square kilometre
in 2010
Congo rank
149th
Suriname rank
146th

Gross fixed capital formation … Private square kilometre Purchasing over time

  • Congo
  • Suriname
000000196119902019

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.5 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Suriname ahead.

Congo ranks 149th and Suriname ranks 146th of 170 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 3 and Suriname in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Suriname
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Suriname
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Congo
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Congo
2000s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Suriname
2010s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices, Congo or Suriname?
Suriname, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Congo as of 2010.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices between Congo and Suriname?
0 units per square kilometre, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Suriname?
50 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2010.
How do Congo and Suriname rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices?
Congo ranks 149th and Suriname ranks 146th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Suriname: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-private-sector-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-ppp-4/congo-rep/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-private-sector-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-ppp-4/congo-rep/suriname/">Congo vs Suriname: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,126 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017 divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.