China vs Philippines: Gross fixed capital formation … Private square kilometre Purchasing

China
0.0006 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Philippines
0.0005 units per square kilometre
in 2019
China rank
44th
Philippines rank
47th

Gross fixed capital formation … Private square kilometre Purchasing over time

  • China
  • Philippines
0000.001196119902019

How they compare

China currently reports 0.0006 units per square kilometre against 0.0005 units per square kilometre in Philippines, a difference of 0.0001 units per square kilometre.

That makes China's figure about 1.2 times Philippines's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Philippines ahead.

China ranks 44th and Philippines ranks 47th of 170 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Philippines in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Philippines Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Philippines
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre Philippines
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre Philippines
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre Philippines
2000s 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre Philippines
2010s 0.0004 units per square kilometre 0.0003 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices, China or Philippines?
China, at 0.0006 units per square kilometre against 0.0005 units per square kilometre in Philippines as of 2019.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices between China and Philippines?
0.0001 units per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Philippines?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do China and Philippines rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices?
China ranks 44th and Philippines ranks 47th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Philippines: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-private-sector-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-ppp-4/china/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-private-sector-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-ppp-4/china/philippines/">China vs Philippines: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,126 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017 divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.