Chile vs Nepal: Gross fixed capital formation … Private square kilometre Purchasing

Chile
0.0001 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Nepal
0.0001 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Chile rank
83rd
Nepal rank
81st

Gross fixed capital formation … Private square kilometre Purchasing over time

  • Chile
  • Nepal
0000196119902019

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 0.0001 units per square kilometre against 0.0001 units per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 83rd and Nepal ranks 81st of 170 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Nepal Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Chile
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Chile
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Chile
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Chile
2000s 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Chile
2010s 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices, Chile or Nepal?
Nepal, at 0.0001 units per square kilometre against 0.0001 units per square kilometre in Chile as of 2019.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices between Chile and Nepal?
0 units per square kilometre, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Nepal?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Chile and Nepal rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices?
Chile ranks 83rd and Nepal ranks 81st of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Nepal: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-private-sector-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-ppp-4/chile/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-private-sector-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-ppp-4/chile/nepal/">Chile vs Nepal: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,126 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017 divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.