Hong Kong vs Norway: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant … unit GDP

Hong Kong
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2019
Norway
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2019
Hong Kong rank
145th
Norway rank
148th

Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant … unit GDP over time

  • Hong Kong
  • Norway
00000196019892019

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Norway, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Hong Kong ahead.

Hong Kong ranks 145th and Norway ranks 148th of 171 countries.

Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Norway Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Hong Kong
1970s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Hong Kong
1980s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Hong Kong
1990s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Hong Kong
2000s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Hong Kong
2010s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices, Hong Kong or Norway?
Hong Kong, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Norway as of 2019.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices between Hong Kong and Norway?
0 units per US$ of GDP, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Norway?
60 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2019.
How do Hong Kong and Norway rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices?
Hong Kong ranks 145th and Norway ranks 148th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Norway: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-private-sector-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-ppp-3/hong-kong-sar-china/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-private-sector-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-ppp-3/hong-kong-sar-china/norway/">Hong Kong vs Norway: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017, per unit of GDP
Unit
units per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 8,810 data points, 1960–2019
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017 divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.