Germany vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant … unit GDP

Germany
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2019
Zimbabwe
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2008
Germany rank
113th
Zimbabwe rank
110th

Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant … unit GDP over time

  • Germany
  • Zimbabwe
0000196019892019

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Germany, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Germany ahead.

Germany ranks 113th and Zimbabwe ranks 110th of 171 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Germany averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Germany Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Germany
1970s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Germany
1980s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Germany
1990s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Germany
2000s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices, Germany or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Germany as of 2008.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices between Germany and Zimbabwe?
0 units per US$ of GDP, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Zimbabwe?
49 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2008.
How do Germany and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices?
Germany ranks 113th and Zimbabwe ranks 110th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Germany vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-private-sector-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-ppp-3/germany/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-private-sector-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-ppp-3/germany/zimbabwe/">Germany vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017, per unit of GDP
Unit
units per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 8,810 data points, 1960–2019
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017 divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.