China vs Tanzania: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant … unit GDP

China
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2019
Tanzania
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2019
China rank
42nd
Tanzania rank
43rd

Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant … unit GDP over time

  • China
  • Tanzania
00000196019892019

How they compare

China currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Tanzania, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Tanzania ahead.

China ranks 42nd and Tanzania ranks 43rd of 171 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, China averaged higher in 3 and Tanzania in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Tanzania
1970s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Tanzania
1980s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP China
1990s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Tanzania
2000s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP China
2010s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices, China or Tanzania?
China, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Tanzania as of 2019.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices between China and Tanzania?
0 units per US$ of GDP, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Tanzania?
60 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2019.
How do China and Tanzania rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices?
China ranks 42nd and Tanzania ranks 43rd of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Tanzania: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-private-sector-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-ppp-3/china/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-private-sector-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-ppp-3/china/tanzania/">China vs Tanzania: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017, per unit of GDP
Unit
units per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 8,810 data points, 1960–2019
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017 divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.