Belarus vs North Macedonia: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant … unit GDP

Belarus
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2013
North Macedonia
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2017
Belarus rank
30th
North Macedonia rank
32nd

Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant … unit GDP over time

  • Belarus
  • North Macedonia
0000199020032017

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in North Macedonia, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 30th and North Macedonia ranks 32nd of 171 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and North Macedonia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus North Macedonia Difference Ahead
1990s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP North Macedonia
2000s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Belarus
2010s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices, Belarus or North Macedonia?
Belarus, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in North Macedonia as of 2013.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices between Belarus and North Macedonia?
0 units per US$ of GDP, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and North Macedonia?
24 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2013.
How do Belarus and North Macedonia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices?
Belarus ranks 30th and North Macedonia ranks 32nd of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs North Macedonia: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-private-sector-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-ppp-3/belarus/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-private-sector-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-ppp-3/belarus/north-macedonia/">Belarus vs North Macedonia: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017, per unit of GDP
Unit
units per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 8,810 data points, 1960–2019
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017 divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.