Norway vs Singapore: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices
Norway
19.79
in 2019
Singapore
20
in 2019
Norway rank
40th
Singapore rank
37th
Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices over time
- Norway
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 20 against 19.79 in Norway, a difference of 0.21.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Singapore ahead.
Norway ranks 40th and Singapore ranks 37th of 173 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Norway averaged higher in 1 and Singapore in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Norway | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 23.16 | 31.06 | 7.9 | Singapore |
| 1970s | 25.2 | 20.11 | 5.09 | Norway |
| 1980s | 20.98 | 21.21 | 0.2282 | Singapore |
| 1990s | 15.18 | 23.84 | 8.66 | Singapore |
| 2000s | 17.29 | 21.03 | 3.73 | Singapore |
| 2010s | 19.34 | 21.6 | 2.26 | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices, Norway or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 20 against 19.79 in Norway as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices between Norway and Singapore?
- 0.21, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Singapore?
- 60 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2019.
- How do Norway and Singapore rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices?
- Norway ranks 40th and Singapore ranks 37th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Percent of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides comprehensive data for investment and capital stock for the general government, private sector and public-private partnerships, across the Fund member countries.