Mexico vs Sri Lanka: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices
Mexico
15.01
in 2019
Sri Lanka
14.88
in 2019
Mexico rank
91st
Sri Lanka rank
93rd
Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices over time
- Mexico
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 15.01 against 14.88 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.13.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Mexico ahead.
Mexico ranks 91st and Sri Lanka ranks 93rd of 173 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 5 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 17.77 | 11.64 | 6.13 | Mexico |
| 1970s | 15.35 | 10.89 | 4.46 | Mexico |
| 1980s | 11 | 13.85 | 2.85 | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 14.44 | 12.1 | 2.34 | Mexico |
| 2000s | 14.37 | 12.97 | 1.4 | Mexico |
| 2010s | 15.36 | 15.3 | 0.0612 | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices, Mexico or Sri Lanka?
- Mexico, at 15.01 against 14.88 in Sri Lanka as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices between Mexico and Sri Lanka?
- 0.13, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Sri Lanka?
- 60 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2019.
- How do Mexico and Sri Lanka rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices?
- Mexico ranks 91st and Sri Lanka ranks 93rd of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Percent of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides comprehensive data for investment and capital stock for the general government, private sector and public-private partnerships, across the Fund member countries.