Mauritius vs Namibia: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices
Mauritius
10.68
in 2019
Namibia
10.57
in 2019
Mauritius rank
129th
Namibia rank
132nd
Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices over time
- Mauritius
- Namibia
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 10.68 against 10.57 in Namibia, a difference of 0.11.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Namibia ahead.
Mauritius ranks 129th and Namibia ranks 132nd of 173 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 4 and Namibia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 7.16 | 8.52 | 1.36 | Namibia |
| 1970s | 10.73 | 7.42 | 3.31 | Mauritius |
| 1980s | 8.51 | 4.98 | 3.53 | Mauritius |
| 1990s | 11.52 | 5.8 | 5.72 | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 12.74 | 9.48 | 3.26 | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 11.31 | 13.47 | 2.16 | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices, Mauritius or Namibia?
- Mauritius, at 10.68 against 10.57 in Namibia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices between Mauritius and Namibia?
- 0.11, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Namibia?
- 60 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2019.
- How do Mauritius and Namibia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices?
- Mauritius ranks 129th and Namibia ranks 132nd of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Percent of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides comprehensive data for investment and capital stock for the general government, private sector and public-private partnerships, across the Fund member countries.