Latvia vs Malaysia: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices
Latvia
17.15
in 2019
Malaysia
16.67
in 2019
Latvia rank
67th
Malaysia rank
69th
Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices over time
- Latvia
- Malaysia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 17.15 against 16.67 in Malaysia, a difference of 0.48.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Malaysia ahead.
Latvia ranks 67th and Malaysia ranks 69th of 173 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Malaysia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11.41 | 22.51 | 11.1 | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 22.26 | 11.76 | 10.5 | Latvia |
| 2010s | 16.89 | 15.6 | 1.29 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices, Latvia or Malaysia?
- Latvia, at 17.15 against 16.67 in Malaysia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices between Latvia and Malaysia?
- 0.48, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Malaysia?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Latvia and Malaysia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices?
- Latvia ranks 67th and Malaysia ranks 69th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Percent of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides comprehensive data for investment and capital stock for the general government, private sector and public-private partnerships, across the Fund member countries.