Hong Kong, China vs Slovenia: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices
Hong Kong, China
15.99
in 2019
Slovenia
15.93
in 2019
Hong Kong, China rank
76th
Slovenia rank
79th
Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Slovenia
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 15.99 against 15.93 in Slovenia, a difference of 0.06.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 76th and Slovenia ranks 79th of 173 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 26.67 | 19.81 | 6.86 | Hong Kong, China |
| 2000s | 22.74 | 22.67 | 0.0695 | Hong Kong, China |
| 2010s | 19.88 | 15.2 | 4.68 | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices, Hong Kong, China or Slovenia?
- Hong Kong, China, at 15.99 against 15.93 in Slovenia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices between Hong Kong, China and Slovenia?
- 0.06, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Slovenia?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Slovenia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 76th and Slovenia ranks 79th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Percent of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides comprehensive data for investment and capital stock for the general government, private sector and public-private partnerships, across the Fund member countries.