Eswatini vs Gambia: Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices
Eswatini
5.38
in 2019
Gambia
6.3
in 2019
Eswatini rank
160th
Gambia rank
157th
Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices over time
- Eswatini
- Gambia
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 6.3 against 5.38 in Eswatini, a difference of 0.92.
That makes Gambia's figure about 1.2 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 160th and Gambia ranks 157th of 173 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 4 and Gambia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Gambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 16.88 | 3.22 | 13.66 | Eswatini |
| 1980s | 25.76 | 3.39 | 22.37 | Eswatini |
| 1990s | 21.33 | 5.47 | 15.86 | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 8.6 | 5.97 | 2.63 | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 5.17 | 5.18 | 0.0095 | Gambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices, Eswatini or Gambia?
- Gambia, at 6.3 against 5.38 in Eswatini as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices between Eswatini and Gambia?
- 0.92, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Gambia?
- 50 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2019.
- How do Eswatini and Gambia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation, private sector, constant prices?
- Eswatini ranks 160th and Gambia ranks 157th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Gross fixed capital formation, Private sector, Constant prices, Percent of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides comprehensive data for investment and capital stock for the general government, private sector and public-private partnerships, across the Fund member countries.