Yemen vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Yemen
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 7.9% against 6.2% in Yemen, a difference of 1.7%.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.3 times Yemen's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Yemen ranks 176th and Zimbabwe ranks 174th of 181 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Yemen averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Yemen | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 18.6% | 19.0% | 0.4% | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 17.9% | 7.6% | 10.4% | Yemen |
| 2010s | 5.8% | 11.6% | 5.9% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Yemen or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 7.9% against 6.2% in Yemen as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Yemen and Zimbabwe?
- 1.7%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Yemen and Zimbabwe?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2018.
- How do Yemen and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Yemen ranks 176th and Zimbabwe ranks 174th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period.