South Asia vs Suriname: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- South Asia
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 37.5% against 31.0% in South Asia, a difference of 6.5%.
That makes Suriname's figure about 1.2 times South Asia's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
South Asia ranks 9th and Suriname ranks 7th of 43 groups.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Asia | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 34.1% | 43.2% | 9.1% | Suriname |
| 2010s | 32.8% | 37.5% | 4.7% | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, South Asia or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 37.5% against 31.0% in South Asia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between South Asia and Suriname?
- 6.5%, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Asia and Suriname?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2010.
- How do South Asia and Suriname rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- South Asia ranks 9th and Suriname ranks 7th of 43 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period.