Papua New Guinea vs Trinidad and Tobago: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 19.0% against 18.1% in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.9%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 135th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 132nd of 181 countries.
Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Papua New Guinea or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 19.0% against 18.1% in Papua New Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Papua New Guinea and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0.9%, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2004.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 135th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 132nd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period.