Mali vs Namibia: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Mali
- Namibia
How they compare
Mali currently reports 21.7% against 21.5% in Namibia, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Namibia ahead.
Mali ranks 102nd and Namibia ranks 104th of 180 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 3 and Namibia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 18.5% | 16.4% | 2.1% | Mali |
| 1990s | 22.6% | 18.5% | 4.1% | Mali |
| 2000s | 19.5% | 21.0% | 1.5% | Namibia |
| 2010s | 23.2% | 24.3% | 1.0% | Namibia |
| 2020s | 21.7% | 19.7% | 2.0% | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Mali or Namibia?
- Mali, at 21.7% against 21.5% in Namibia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Mali and Namibia?
- 0.2%, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Namibia?
- 46 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2025.
- How do Mali and Namibia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Mali ranks 102nd and Namibia ranks 104th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period.