Lower middle income vs Uzbekistan: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Lower middle income
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 34.0% against 28.9% in Lower middle income, a difference of 5.1%.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.2 times Lower middle income's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Lower middle income ranks 12th and Uzbekistan ranks 13th of 43 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, Lower middle income averaged higher in 2 and Uzbekistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lower middle income | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 22.4% | 25.7% | 3.2% | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 26.4% | 23.2% | 3.2% | Lower middle income |
| 2010s | 26.5% | 22.9% | 3.6% | Lower middle income |
| 2020s | 27.6% | 31.9% | 4.3% | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Lower middle income or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 34.0% against 28.9% in Lower middle income as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Lower middle income and Uzbekistan?
- 5.1%, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lower middle income and Uzbekistan?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
- How do Lower middle income and Uzbekistan rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Lower middle income ranks 12th and Uzbekistan ranks 13th of 43 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period.