Lebanon vs South Sudan: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Lebanon
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 5.8% against 1.4% in Lebanon, a difference of 4.4%.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 4.0 times Lebanon's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Lebanon has been ahead every year.
Lebanon ranks 180th and South Sudan ranks 177th of 181 countries.
Lebanon has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lebanon | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27.7% | 13.7% | 14.0% | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 24.8% | 8.7% | 16.2% | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Lebanon or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 5.8% against 1.4% in Lebanon as of 2015.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Lebanon and South Sudan?
- 4.4%, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and South Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2015.
- How do Lebanon and South Sudan rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Lebanon ranks 180th and South Sudan ranks 177th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period.