Kiribati vs Viet Nam: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Kiribati
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 29.2% against 29.0% in Kiribati, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Viet Nam ahead.
Kiribati ranks 27th and Viet Nam ranks 25th of 181 countries.
Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.6% | 33.0% | 17.4% | Viet Nam |
| 2010s | 24.7% | 30.2% | 5.5% | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | 21.6% | 30.2% | 8.6% | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Kiribati or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 29.2% against 29.0% in Kiribati as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Kiribati and Viet Nam?
- 0.2%, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Viet Nam?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Kiribati and Viet Nam rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Kiribati ranks 27th and Viet Nam ranks 25th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period.