Japan vs Timor-Leste: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Japan
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Japan currently reports 27.8% against 27.0% in Timor-Leste, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Timor-Leste ahead.
Japan ranks 41st and Timor-Leste ranks 44th of 181 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 2 and Timor-Leste in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27.1% | 26.2% | 0.9% | Japan |
| 2010s | 25.7% | 41.4% | 15.7% | Timor-Leste |
| 2020s | 27.5% | 16.4% | 11.1% | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Japan or Timor-Leste?
- Japan, at 27.8% against 27.0% in Timor-Leste as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Japan and Timor-Leste?
- 0.8%, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Timor-Leste?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Japan and Timor-Leste rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Japan ranks 41st and Timor-Leste ranks 44th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period.