IDA only vs India: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- IDA only
- India
How they compare
India currently reports 31.7% against 24.6% in IDA only, a difference of 7.1%.
That makes India's figure about 1.3 times IDA only's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was India ahead.
IDA only ranks 19th and India ranks 16th of 43 groups.
India has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IDA only | India | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 19.9% | 25.1% | 5.2% | India |
| 2000s | 23.4% | 31.4% | 8.0% | India |
| 2010s | 26.0% | 30.5% | 4.5% | India |
| 2020s | 26.7% | 30.7% | 4.1% | India |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, IDA only or India?
- India, at 31.7% against 24.6% in IDA only as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between IDA only and India?
- 7.1%, with India ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IDA only and India?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do IDA only and India rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- IDA only ranks 19th and India ranks 16th of 43 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period.