IBRD only vs Palau: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- IBRD only
- Palau
How they compare
Palau currently reports 35.8% against 31.1% in IBRD only, a difference of 4.7%.
That makes Palau's figure about 1.2 times IBRD only's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Palau ahead.
IBRD only ranks 8th and Palau ranks 8th of 43 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, IBRD only averaged higher in 1 and Palau in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IBRD only | Palau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27.8% | 35.3% | 7.5% | Palau |
| 2010s | 31.2% | 29.5% | 1.7% | IBRD only |
| 2020s | 31.8% | 38.7% | 6.9% | Palau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, IBRD only or Palau?
- Palau, at 35.8% against 31.1% in IBRD only as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between IBRD only and Palau?
- 4.7%, with Palau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Palau?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do IBRD only and Palau rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- IBRD only ranks 8th and Palau ranks 8th of 43 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period.