Guinea vs Suriname: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Guinea
- Suriname
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 38.1% against 37.5% in Suriname, a difference of 0.6%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
Guinea ranks 6th and Suriname ranks 7th of 181 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22.0% | 43.2% | 21.2% | Suriname |
| 2010s | 19.1% | 37.5% | 18.4% | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Guinea or Suriname?
- Guinea, at 38.1% against 37.5% in Suriname as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Guinea and Suriname?
- 0.6%, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Suriname?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2010.
- How do Guinea and Suriname rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Guinea ranks 6th and Suriname ranks 7th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period.