Eswatini vs Uruguay: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Eswatini
- Uruguay
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 16.1% against 15.8% in Uruguay, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Uruguay ahead.
Eswatini ranks 152nd and Uruguay ranks 155th of 181 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 16.6% | 17.9% | 1.3% | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 15.9% | 17.1% | 1.2% | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Eswatini or Uruguay?
- Eswatini, at 16.1% against 15.8% in Uruguay as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Eswatini and Uruguay?
- 0.3%, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Uruguay?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2024.
- How do Eswatini and Uruguay rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Eswatini ranks 152nd and Uruguay ranks 155th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period.