Curaçao vs Uzbekistan: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Curaçao
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Curaçao currently reports 34.0% against 34.0% in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Curaçao ahead.
Curaçao ranks 12th and Uzbekistan ranks 13th of 181 countries.
Curaçao has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Curaçao | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.3% | 24.0% | 2.2% | Curaçao |
| 2010s | 28.8% | 21.5% | 7.3% | Curaçao |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Curaçao or Uzbekistan?
- Curaçao, at 34.0% against 34.0% in Uzbekistan as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Curaçao and Uzbekistan?
- 0.0%, with Curaçao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Curaçao and Uzbekistan?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2018.
- How do Curaçao and Uzbekistan rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Curaçao ranks 12th and Uzbekistan ranks 13th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period.