China vs Suriname: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- China
- Suriname
How they compare
China currently reports 39.7% against 37.5% in Suriname, a difference of 2.2%.
That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Suriname's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was China ahead.
China ranks 4th and Suriname ranks 7th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 39.6% | 43.2% | 3.6% | Suriname |
| 2010s | 43.5% | 37.5% | 6.0% | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, China or Suriname?
- China, at 39.7% against 37.5% in Suriname as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between China and Suriname?
- 2.2%, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Suriname?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2010.
- How do China and Suriname rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- China ranks 4th and Suriname ranks 7th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period.