Chile vs Kazakhstan: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Chile
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 24.3% against 24.1% in Chile, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Chile ranks 69th and Kazakhstan ranks 66th of 181 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Kazakhstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 25.8% | 21.6% | 4.2% | Chile |
| 2000s | 22.8% | 25.6% | 2.8% | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 24.6% | 22.4% | 2.2% | Chile |
| 2020s | 23.9% | 23.8% | 0.1% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Chile or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 24.3% against 24.1% in Chile as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Chile and Kazakhstan?
- 0.2%, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Kazakhstan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Kazakhstan rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Chile ranks 69th and Kazakhstan ranks 66th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period.