Chile vs Estonia: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Chile
- Estonia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 24.2% against 24.1% in Chile, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 69th and Estonia ranks 68th of 181 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 26.2% | 27.3% | 1.1% | Estonia |
| 2000s | 22.8% | 30.9% | 8.1% | Estonia |
| 2010s | 24.6% | 25.5% | 1.0% | Estonia |
| 2020s | 23.9% | 26.6% | 2.7% | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Chile or Estonia?
- Estonia, at 24.2% against 24.1% in Chile as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Chile and Estonia?
- 0.1%, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Estonia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2025.
- How do Chile and Estonia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Chile ranks 69th and Estonia ranks 68th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period.