Canada vs Serbia: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Canada
- Serbia
How they compare
Canada currently reports 22.9% against 22.8% in Serbia, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Canada ahead.
Canada ranks 83rd and Serbia ranks 85th of 181 countries.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 19.6% | 10.8% | 8.8% | Canada |
| 2000s | 21.4% | 18.0% | 3.4% | Canada |
| 2010s | 23.5% | 18.1% | 5.4% | Canada |
| 2020s | 23.2% | 23.1% | 0.1% | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Canada or Serbia?
- Canada, at 22.9% against 22.8% in Serbia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Canada and Serbia?
- 0.1%, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Serbia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
- How do Canada and Serbia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Canada ranks 83rd and Serbia ranks 85th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period.