Mauritius vs Trinidad and Tobago: Gross Fixed Capital Formation Deflator — Value Standard Local

Mauritius
148.59 SLC
in 2024
Trinidad and Tobago
149.37 SLC
in 2024
Mauritius rank
63rd
Trinidad and Tobago rank
62nd

Gross Fixed Capital Formation Deflator — Value Standard Local over time

  • Mauritius
  • Trinidad and Tobago
0200400600197019972024

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 149.37 SLC against 148.59 SLC in Mauritius, a difference of 0.78 SLC.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Mauritius ranks 63rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 62nd of 194 countries.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1970s 5.82 SLC 8.96 SLC 3.14 SLC Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 19.85 SLC 26.32 SLC 6.47 SLC Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 42.84 SLC 65.12 SLC 22.28 SLC Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 69.01 SLC 108.02 SLC 39.02 SLC Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 99.3 SLC 116.46 SLC 17.15 SLC Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 133.5 SLC 237.94 SLC 104.44 SLC Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation deflator — value standard local, Mauritius or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 149.37 SLC against 148.59 SLC in Mauritius as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation deflator — value standard local between Mauritius and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.78 SLC, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Trinidad and Tobago?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Mauritius and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for gross fixed capital formation deflator — value standard local?
Mauritius ranks 63rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 62nd of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Gross Fixed Capital Formation Deflator — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Trinidad and Tobago: Gross Fixed Capital Formation Deflator — Value Standard Local. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-deflator-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices/mauritius/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-deflator-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices/mauritius/trinidad-and-tobago/">Mauritius vs Trinidad and Tobago: Gross Fixed Capital Formation Deflator — Value Standard Local</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Fixed Capital Formation Deflator — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices
Unit
SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
209 places, 10,808 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Deflators database provides the following selection of price deflator series by country and at regional level: Gross Domestic Product deflator, Gross Fixed Capital Formation deflator, Manufacturing Value-Added deflator, and Agriculture, Forestry, Fishery Valued-Added deflator. In the FAOSTAT Deflators database, all series are derived from the United Nations Statistics Division (UNSD) National Accounts Analysis of Main Aggregates database (UNSD AMA). In particular, the implicit Gross Domestic Product deflator, the implicit Gross Fixed Capital Formation deflator, the implicit value added deflator of Agriculture, Forestry, Fishery and the implicit value added deflator of Manufacturing are obtained by dividing the series in current prices by those in constant 2015 prices (base year).