Lithuania vs Serbia: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Lithuania
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 22.83 billion current US$ against 21.84 billion current US$ in Lithuania, a difference of 985.90 million current US$.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Serbia ahead.
Lithuania ranks 73rd and Serbia ranks 71st of 179 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.14 billion current US$ | 2.38 billion current US$ | 247.86 million current US$ | Serbia |
| 2000s | 6.14 billion current US$ | 5.88 billion current US$ | 258.28 million current US$ | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 8.90 billion current US$ | 8.64 billion current US$ | 260.30 million current US$ | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 17.23 billion current US$ | 17.75 billion current US$ | 519.15 million current US$ | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Lithuania or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 22.83 billion current US$ against 21.84 billion current US$ in Lithuania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Lithuania and Serbia?
- 985.90 million current US$, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Serbia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
- How do Lithuania and Serbia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Lithuania ranks 73rd and Serbia ranks 71st of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.