Hong Kong, China vs Republic of Korea: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per capita

Hong Kong, China
9,652 current US$ per person
in 2025
Republic of Korea
10,263 current US$ per person
in 2025
Hong Kong, China rank
28th
Republic of Korea rank
25th

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per capita over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Republic of Korea
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k196019922025

How they compare

Republic of Korea currently reports 10,263 current US$ per person against 9,652 current US$ per person in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 611 current US$ per person.

That makes Republic of Korea's figure about 1.1 times Hong Kong, China's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 28th and Republic of Korea ranks 25th of 181 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 6 and Republic of Korea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Republic of Korea Difference Ahead
1960s 160.4 current US$ per person 28.41 current US$ per person 132 current US$ per person Hong Kong, China
1970s 596.58 current US$ per person 226.23 current US$ per person 370.35 current US$ per person Hong Kong, China
1980s 1,934 current US$ per person 921.23 current US$ per person 1,013 current US$ per person Hong Kong, China
1990s 6,277 current US$ per person 3,595 current US$ per person 2,682 current US$ per person Hong Kong, China
2000s 6,067 current US$ per person 5,541 current US$ per person 526.56 current US$ per person Hong Kong, China
2010s 9,165 current US$ per person 9,009 current US$ per person 156.51 current US$ per person Hong Kong, China
2020s 8,551 current US$ per person 10,957 current US$ per person 2,406 current US$ per person Republic of Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per capita, Hong Kong, China or Republic of Korea?
Republic of Korea, at 10,263 current US$ per person against 9,652 current US$ per person in Hong Kong, China as of 2025.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per capita between Hong Kong, China and Republic of Korea?
611 current US$ per person, with Republic of Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Republic of Korea?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2025.
How do Hong Kong, China and Republic of Korea rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per capita?
Hong Kong, China ranks 28th and Republic of Korea ranks 25th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Republic of Korea: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-capita/hong-kong-sar-china/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-capita/hong-kong-sar-china/korea-rep/">Hong Kong, China vs Republic of Korea: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
224 places, 10,322 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.