What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per capita between Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe?

5.95 current US$ per person, with Zimbabwe ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe?

46 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Burkina Faso vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per capita

Burkina Faso

191.98 current US$ per person

in 2025

Zimbabwe

197.93 current US$ per person

in 2024

Burkina Faso rank

166th

Zimbabwe rank

164th

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per capita over time

Burkina Faso
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 197.93 current US$ per person against 191.98 current US$ per person in Burkina Faso, a difference of 5.95 current US$ per person.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1979 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 166th and Zimbabwe ranks 164th of 181 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Burkina Faso	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
1970s	40.19 current US$ per person	100.25 current US$ per person	60.05 current US$ per person	Zimbabwe
1980s	43.28 current US$ per person	137.99 current US$ per person	94.7 current US$ per person	Zimbabwe
1990s	57 current US$ per person	131.01 current US$ per person	74 current US$ per person	Zimbabwe
2000s	68.43 current US$ per person	40.13 current US$ per person	28.3 current US$ per person	Burkina Faso
2010s	146.59 current US$ per person	178.63 current US$ per person	32.04 current US$ per person	Zimbabwe
2020s	157.64 current US$ per person	193.05 current US$ per person	35.41 current US$ per person	Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per capita, Burkina Faso or Zimbabwe?: Zimbabwe, at 197.93 current US$ per person against 191.98 current US$ per person in Burkina Faso as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per capita between Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe?: 5.95 current US$ per person, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe?: 46 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2024.
How do Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current us$), per capita?: Burkina Faso ranks 166th and Zimbabwe ranks 164th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-capita/burkina-faso/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-us-per-capita/burkina-faso/zimbabwe/">Burkina Faso vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Gross fixed capital formation (current US$), per capita
Unit: current US$ per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 224 places, 10,322 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 07 September 2026

Gross fixed capital formation (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.