Kuwait vs Latvia: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Kuwait
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 10.10 billion current LCU against 8.26 billion current LCU in Kuwait, a difference of 1.83 billion current LCU.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.2 times Kuwait's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Kuwait ahead.
Kuwait ranks 152nd and Latvia ranks 149th of 180 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kuwait averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kuwait | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 7.96 billion current LCU | 5.36 billion current LCU | 2.61 billion current LCU | Kuwait |
| 2020s | 8.07 billion current LCU | 8.22 billion current LCU | 149.88 million current LCU | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Kuwait or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 10.10 billion current LCU against 8.26 billion current LCU in Kuwait as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Kuwait and Latvia?
- 1.83 billion current LCU, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Latvia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Kuwait and Latvia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Kuwait ranks 152nd and Latvia ranks 149th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.