Kazakhstan vs Lebanon: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Kazakhstan
- Lebanon
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 33.59 trillion current LCU against 33.24 trillion current LCU in Kazakhstan, a difference of 345.50 billion current LCU.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lebanon ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 23rd and Lebanon ranks 22nd of 180 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Lebanon in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 183.47 billion current LCU | 6.02 trillion current LCU | 5.83 trillion current LCU | Lebanon |
| 2000s | 2.28 trillion current LCU | 8.02 trillion current LCU | 5.75 trillion current LCU | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 9.61 trillion current LCU | 16.33 trillion current LCU | 6.72 trillion current LCU | Lebanon |
| 2020s | 24.56 trillion current LCU | 19.47 trillion current LCU | 5.09 trillion current LCU | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Kazakhstan or Lebanon?
- Lebanon, at 33.59 trillion current LCU against 33.24 trillion current LCU in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Kazakhstan and Lebanon?
- 345.50 billion current LCU, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Lebanon?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Kazakhstan and Lebanon rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Kazakhstan ranks 23rd and Lebanon ranks 22nd of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.