Guyana vs Namibia: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Guyana
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 58.05 billion current LCU against 53.31 billion current LCU in Guyana, a difference of 4.74 billion current LCU.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Guyana's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Namibia ahead.
Guyana ranks 123rd and Namibia ranks 122nd of 181 countries.
Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 702.70 million current LCU | 547.54 million current LCU | 155.16 million current LCU | Guyana |
| 1990s | 24.53 billion current LCU | 2.74 billion current LCU | 21.80 billion current LCU | Guyana |
| 2000s | 34.81 billion current LCU | 6.93 billion current LCU | 27.88 billion current LCU | Guyana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Guyana or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 58.05 billion current LCU against 53.31 billion current LCU in Guyana as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Guyana and Namibia?
- 4.74 billion current LCU, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Namibia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2005.
- How do Guyana and Namibia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Guyana ranks 123rd and Namibia ranks 122nd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.