Croatia vs Panama: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Croatia
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 27.17 billion current LCU against 23.93 billion current LCU in Croatia, a difference of 3.24 billion current LCU.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 137th and Panama ranks 134th of 180 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 2 and Panama in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.76 billion current LCU | 2.27 billion current LCU | 1.49 billion current LCU | Croatia |
| 2000s | 8.78 billion current LCU | 4.10 billion current LCU | 4.68 billion current LCU | Croatia |
| 2010s | 9.41 billion current LCU | 19.50 billion current LCU | 10.09 billion current LCU | Panama |
| 2020s | 15.89 billion current LCU | 21.71 billion current LCU | 5.82 billion current LCU | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Croatia or Panama?
- Panama, at 27.17 billion current LCU against 23.93 billion current LCU in Croatia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Croatia and Panama?
- 3.24 billion current LCU, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Panama?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
- How do Croatia and Panama rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Croatia ranks 137th and Panama ranks 134th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.