Brazil vs Serbia: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Brazil
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 2.37 trillion current LCU against 2.15 trillion current LCU in Brazil, a difference of 228.56 billion current LCU.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 54th and Serbia ranks 52nd of 180 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 3 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 171.11 billion current LCU | 17.39 billion current LCU | 153.72 billion current LCU | Brazil |
| 2000s | 386.70 billion current LCU | 361.63 billion current LCU | 25.07 billion current LCU | Brazil |
| 2010s | 1.02 trillion current LCU | 818.11 billion current LCU | 198.16 billion current LCU | Brazil |
| 2020s | 1.77 trillion current LCU | 1.88 trillion current LCU | 114.71 billion current LCU | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Brazil or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 2.37 trillion current LCU against 2.15 trillion current LCU in Brazil as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Brazil and Serbia?
- 228.56 billion current LCU, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Serbia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
- How do Brazil and Serbia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Brazil ranks 54th and Serbia ranks 52nd of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.