Belarus vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation

Belarus
71.90 billion current LCU
in 2025
Zimbabwe
65.23 billion current LCU
in 2024
Belarus rank
117th
Zimbabwe rank
118th

Gross fixed capital formation over time

  • Belarus
  • Zimbabwe
020.0B40.0B60.0B80.0B196019922025

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 71.90 billion current LCU against 65.23 billion current LCU in Zimbabwe, a difference of 6.67 billion current LCU.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Belarus ranks 117th and Zimbabwe ranks 118th of 180 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 11.48 million current LCU 569,633 current LCU 10.91 million current LCU Belarus
2000s 1.98 billion current LCU 198,250 current LCU 1.98 billion current LCU Belarus
2010s 23.43 billion current LCU 2.06 million current LCU 23.43 billion current LCU Belarus
2020s 44.94 billion current LCU 14.51 billion current LCU 30.43 billion current LCU Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Belarus or Zimbabwe?
Belarus, at 71.90 billion current LCU against 65.23 billion current LCU in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Belarus and Zimbabwe?
6.67 billion current LCU, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Zimbabwe?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Belarus and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
Belarus ranks 117th and Zimbabwe ranks 118th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu/belarus/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu/belarus/zimbabwe/">Belarus vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
180 places, 8,131 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.