Belarus vs Gambia: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Belarus
- Gambia
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 75.15 billion current LCU against 71.90 billion current LCU in Belarus, a difference of 3.25 billion current LCU.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Gambia ahead.
Belarus ranks 117th and Gambia ranks 116th of 180 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Gambia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Gambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11.48 million current LCU | 644.15 million current LCU | 632.67 million current LCU | Gambia |
| 2000s | 1.98 billion current LCU | 2.94 billion current LCU | 953.74 million current LCU | Gambia |
| 2010s | 23.43 billion current LCU | 11.99 billion current LCU | 11.44 billion current LCU | Belarus |
| 2020s | 49.44 billion current LCU | 43.47 billion current LCU | 5.96 billion current LCU | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Belarus or Gambia?
- Gambia, at 75.15 billion current LCU against 71.90 billion current LCU in Belarus as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Belarus and Gambia?
- 3.25 billion current LCU, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Gambia?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Belarus and Gambia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Belarus ranks 117th and Gambia ranks 116th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.