Hong Kong, China vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per unit of GDP

Hong Kong, China
1.32 current LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Zimbabwe
1.57 current LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Hong Kong, China rank
105th
Zimbabwe rank
102nd

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per unit of GDP over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Zimbabwe
0123196019922025

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 1.57 current LCU per US$ of GDP against 1.32 current LCU per US$ of GDP in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.25 current LCU per US$ of GDP.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Hong Kong, China's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 105th and Zimbabwe ranks 102nd of 181 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 1.44 current LCU per US$ of GDP 0.0001 current LCU per US$ of GDP 1.44 current LCU per US$ of GDP Hong Kong, China
1970s 1.21 current LCU per US$ of GDP 0.0001 current LCU per US$ of GDP 1.21 current LCU per US$ of GDP Hong Kong, China
1980s 1.79 current LCU per US$ of GDP 0.0001 current LCU per US$ of GDP 1.79 current LCU per US$ of GDP Hong Kong, China
1990s 2.22 current LCU per US$ of GDP 0.0001 current LCU per US$ of GDP 2.22 current LCU per US$ of GDP Hong Kong, China
2000s 1.74 current LCU per US$ of GDP 0 current LCU per US$ of GDP 1.74 current LCU per US$ of GDP Hong Kong, China
2010s 1.74 current LCU per US$ of GDP 0.0001 current LCU per US$ of GDP 1.74 current LCU per US$ of GDP Hong Kong, China
2020s 1.3 current LCU per US$ of GDP 0.3545 current LCU per US$ of GDP 0.9477 current LCU per US$ of GDP Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per unit of gdp, Hong Kong, China or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 1.57 current LCU per US$ of GDP against 1.32 current LCU per US$ of GDP in Hong Kong, China as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per unit of gdp between Hong Kong, China and Zimbabwe?
0.25 current LCU per US$ of GDP, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Zimbabwe?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Hong Kong, China and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per unit of gdp?
Hong Kong, China ranks 105th and Zimbabwe ranks 102nd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/hong-kong-sar-china/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/hong-kong-sar-china/zimbabwe/">Hong Kong, China vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per unit of GDP
Unit
current LCU per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 8,134 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.