East Timor vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre

East Timor
24,275 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
16,897 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
East Timor rank
173rd
Zimbabwe rank
176th

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • East Timor
  • Zimbabwe
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k196119922023

How they compare

East Timor currently reports 24,275 current LCU per square kilometre against 16,897 current LCU per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 7,378 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes East Timor's figure about 1.4 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, East Timor has been ahead every year.

East Timor ranks 173rd and Zimbabwe ranks 176th of 177 countries.

East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Timor Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 9,302 current LCU per square kilometre 0.5125 current LCU per square kilometre 9,302 current LCU per square kilometre East Timor
2010s 37,833 current LCU per square kilometre 5.33 current LCU per square kilometre 37,828 current LCU per square kilometre East Timor
2020s 25,012 current LCU per square kilometre 4,725 current LCU per square kilometre 20,286 current LCU per square kilometre East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre, East Timor or Zimbabwe?
East Timor, at 24,275 current LCU per square kilometre against 16,897 current LCU per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre between East Timor and Zimbabwe?
7,378 current LCU per square kilometre, with East Timor ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Timor and Zimbabwe?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do East Timor and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (current lcu), per square kilometre?
East Timor ranks 173rd and Zimbabwe ranks 176th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Timor vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/timor-leste/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/timor-leste/zimbabwe/">East Timor vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
177 places, 7,630 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.